2024-03-29T02:13:00Z
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/oai
oai:pub.uni-bielefeld.de:2955180
2021-06-21T08:19:43Z
journal_article
doc-type:article
ddc:290
ddc:300
journal_articleFtxt
open_access
Muslim Solidarity and the Lack of Effective Protection for Rohingya Refugees in Southeast Asia
Missbach, Antje
Stange, Gunnar
forced displacement
refugee protection
Rohingya
Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
Indonesia
Malaysia
Myanmar
ddc:290
ddc:300
Missbach A, Stange G. Muslim Solidarity and the Lack of Effective Protection for Rohingya Refugees in Southeast Asia. <em>Social Sciences</em>. 2021;10(5):166.
Southeast Asia has the weakest normative frameworks for refugee protection of any region in the world apart from the Middle East. Only two out of ten member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) have signed the 1951 International Refugee Convention. Nevertheless, the 2012 ASEAN Human Rights Declaration explicitly mentions the right to seek and receive asylum ‘in accordance with the laws of such State and applicable international agreements’ (ASEAN 2012). One of the litmus tests for this right has been the regional treatment of the Rohingya, a Muslim minority from Myanmar that faces forced displacement, discrimination, and large-scale state violence. Based on media content analysis and a scientific literature review, this paper sheds light on how ASEAN’s most prominent Muslim member countries, Indonesia and Malaysia, advocate on behalf of the forcibly displaced Rohingya. In particular, this paper focuses on competing forms of political interventions and shifting notions of Muslim solidarity. While Indonesia and Malaysia have been very vocal in bilateral, regional, and international forums to criticise the Myanmar government for their violation of basic human rights, both countries remain highly reluctant to offer sanctuary to Rohingya refugees, of which several thousand have attempted to reach Indonesia and Malaysia. This research finds that the notion of Muslim solidarity remains a symbolic rhetoric primarily directed at domestic audiences and the failure to render effective protection to refugees has rather increased over the last five years.
MDPI
2021
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
doc-type:article
text
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0070-pub-29551809
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2955180
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2955180/2955555
eng
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/socsci10050166
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2076-0760
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/000656454000001
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
oai:pub.uni-bielefeld.de:2304034
2018-07-24T12:59:58Z
bi_dissertation
doc-type:doctoralThesis
ddc:290
bi_dissertationFtxt
open_access
Buddhadasa's movement : an analysis of its origins, development, and social impact
Payulpitack, Suchira
Thailand
Buddhismus
Therawada
Religiöse Bewegung
Sozialer Wandel
Buddhadasa Bhikkhu
Theravada Buddhism
Religious movement
Buddhism in Thailand
ddc:290
Payulpitack S. <em>Buddhadasa's movement : an analysis of its origins, development, and social impact</em>. Bielefeld (Germany): Bielefeld University; 1991.
The study aims to examine two issues: first the formation, development, and social impact of Buddhadasa's movement; and second the implications of modernization in Thai society. These two issues will be treated as closely interrelated. The main questions are the following:
(1)Why and under what conditions did Buddhadasa's movement come about?
(2)What type of movement is it?
(3)How did the movement develop and what were the factors which promoted and inhibited its development?
(4)What is its function for the members, and why does it appear to be most meaningful for the intellectuals?
(5)What is the social impact of the movement?
The particular hypothesis of this study is that Buddhadasa's movement has had and will continue to have a significant social impact on Thai society.
Bielefeld University
1991
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
doc-type:doctoralThesis
text
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:361-1249
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2304034
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2304034/2304041
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2304034/2304042
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2304034/2304043
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2304034/2304044
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2304034/2304045
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2304034/2304046
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2304034/2304040
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2304034/2304039
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2304034/2304037
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2304034/2304038
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2304034/2304047
eng
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
oai:pub.uni-bielefeld.de:2301807
2018-07-24T13:00:13Z
bi_dissertation
doc-type:doctoralThesis
ddc:290
bi_dissertationFtxt
open_access
Religiöse Sozialisation und Entwicklung bei muslimischen Jugendlichen in Deutschland und in der Türkei : empirische Analyse und religionspädagogische Herausforderungen
Aygün, Adem
Deutschland
Türkei
Muslim
Jugend
Religiöse Sozialisation
Glaubensentwicklung
Muslimische Glaubensentwicklung
Muslimische Religiosität
Muslimische Jugendliche
Muslimische Orientierungen
ddc:290
Aygün A. <em>Religiöse Sozialisation und Entwicklung bei muslimischen Jugendlichen in Deutschland und in der Türkei : empirische Analyse und religionspädagogische Herausforderungen</em>. Bielefeld (Germany): Bielefeld University; 2010.
Bielefeld University
2010
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
doc-type:doctoralThesis
text
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:361-17584
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2301807
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2301807/2301810
deu
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/